| ARTICLES / ESSAYS
Day 14 update
Traveling! Sumilao Farmers
23 October 2007
As early as 3:15 a.m., the Sumilao
farmers together with the support groups, started to set their feet in the
roads of Tubod, Taganan, Sison and Surigao City, negotiating a total of 37
kilometers.
The weather was good when they
started the walk but when they reached Brgy. Bad-as, the sun started to
disappear and thick nimbus clouds began to dominate the sky. It was then
when the marchers wore their raincoats and went on with their walk.
Because of the heavy rain, the
Sumilao farmers decided to seek refuge in the covered court of Brgy.
Bonifacio, Surigao City. When they settled and began to prepare for lunch
and learned that the food was not enough for everyone, they decided to let
the ladies eat first and cook additional food for those who prefer to eat
later.
While the lady marchers were having
their lunch, the men found a basket ball. It was then that the fun and
friendship game began…
"Traveling!" cried the
referee together with the audience-turned-fans.
“Boys! Boys! Ayaw Kompiyansa!
(Don't be too complacent),” shouted the cheerers of the winning team.
Big smiles and joyful sounds echoed
the covered basketball court for at least 2 hours.
Traveling is one of the violations
in basketball when a player tries to run while holding the ball. The traveling
rule says one has to be holding the ball to travel — one must have
control. It is not only to give up personal control but team control as
well when one makes a legitimate attempt for goal. In relation to the
struggle of the Sumilao farmers, they are carrying with them their goal
that the disputed 144-hectare of landholding will soon be under their
ownership and possession. That the 60-day walk to Malacañang is their
strategy to register their disgust to the present administration in
handling their plight and to educate the public as regards the state of
the country's Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP).
The local community was amazed when
they learned that after seven-and-a-half hours of walk, the farmers still
had high energy dribbling the ball, running back and forth in the court,
and shooting the ball in the ring.
Indeed, even in playing basketball,
the Sumilao farmers seem to be very serious in their sacrifice of
traveling…
Highlighting One of their
Arguments
One of the bases of the Office of
the President (OP) in denying the right of the Sumilao farmers over the
disputed land was the legal standing of the farmers as claimants of such
land.
The Sumilao farmers are real
parties in interest in the petition for cancellation and/or revocation of
the conversion order. A real party in interest is one who could be
benefited or injured by the judgment or the party entitled to the avails
of the suit (Section 2, Rule 3 of the Rules of Court).
The fact that SMFI plans to illegally
transform the whole 144-hectare property into a piggery farm right in
the midst of the farmers' residences, in violation of the authorized
development plan in the conversion order, raises immediate concern to the
petitioners. The active participation of the actual residents and the
landless farmers in filing the instant petition, as they are the ones who
are directly affected thereby, confirms their legal standing to petition
its cancellation.
The Sumilao farmers are the actual
residents and qualified farmer-beneficiaries of the 144-hectare land,
represent not only themselves but also their future generations who are
directly affected by NQSRMDC and SMFI's illegal conversion of the land,
and who are the future beneficiaries thereof.
The effect of granting the petition
for revocation of the conversion order is the reversion of the land
to the status of agricultural land and shall be subject to CARP coverage
as circumstances may warrant. The Sumilao farmers and their future
generations will be the beneficiaries of the subject land's CARP coverage
under Section 22 of RA 6657. The cancellation of the Conversion Order will
result in the reversion of the land to agricultural use which is coverable
under CARP. In other words,
the cancellation of the Conversion Order will redound to the benefit of
the Sumilao farmers and their future generations, otherwise, they will
suffer the consequences if the Conversion Order will be upheld.
Further, the Sumilao farmers being
the landless residents of San Vicente, Sumilao, are the qualified farmer
beneficiaries under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law. Section
22, RA 6657 provides that "The lands covered by the CARP shall be
distributed as much as possible to landless residents of the same
barangay, or in the absence thereof, landless residents of the same
municipality ".
We should not lose sight of the
fact that the MAPALAD (one of the Petitioners) are the former holders
of a Certificate of Land Ownership Award No. TCT/CLOA No. 00240227 issued
to 137 MAPALAD farmer-beneficiaries in 1995, long before the proceedings
before the Supreme Court in the Fortich case. The TCT/CLOA was even
registered before the Register of Deeds in the same year.
In fact, by virtue of the
"Win-win Resolution" issued by the Office of the President
through Executive Secretary Corona, the farmers were again identified as
the qualified farmer beneficiaries for the 100-hectare portion of the
subject land. Applications to Purchase and Farmers' Undertaking (APFUs)
were duly executed by the farmers recognizing their existing right to
ownership of the land.
The mere fact that the farmers were
identified twice as beneficiaries under a valid and existing law,
the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (RA 6657), undoubtedly
confirms their right to the subject property. Their TCT/CLOA was cancelled
precisely as a result of the issuance of the conversion order, which this
present petition seeks to cancel. It does not take any legal reasoning to
conclude that these farmers stand to benefit from the resolution of this
petition. They have every right to be the beneficiaries of the subject
land's CARP coverage under Section 22 of RA 6657.
Moreover, DAR Administrative
Order 1, series of 2002, the rules on conversion, is very clear that
the Sumilao farmers indubitably have the legal standing for filing the
petition to revoke the conversion order. The said rule is unequivocal when
it says:
"Section 46. Filing of
Petition – Any person may file a petition to revoke, and the
landowner may file a petition to withdraw, the Conversion Order before
the approving authority xxx."
The abovementioned rule states that
any person may file a petition for revocation of a conversion
order. This rule applies to all types of conversion from agricultural to
non-agricultural uses because all such conversions are regulated by the
DAR as mandated by RA 6657. The rule is in line with the policy that
conversion of lands is strictly regulated by the State and greater
vigilance from the people is needed to assist the State.
The section on intervention stated
in the Agrarian Law Implementation (ALI) Cases also clearly
illustrates who the DAR considers as entities having the legal personality
to intervene in the adjudication of cases involving agrarian law
implementation.
Section 16 of DAR Administrative
Order 1, series of 2003 states:
"No intervention shall be
given due course unless the intervenor shows proof that he has a
substantial right or interest in the case which he cannot adequately
protect in another case. This notwithstanding, potential farmer
beneficiaries have a substantial right, interest, and legal personality to
intervene. No intervenor shall, however, be allowed to file any motion
to postpone/extend/reset or any pleading which may in any way delay the
case which he seeks to intervene in."
It is clear that in the
adjudication of cases entailing implementation of agrarian laws, even
mere potential farmer-beneficiaries may intervene. Thus, the Sumilao
farmers herein have the legal standing or interest to file the instant
petition for cancellation/revocation of the conversion order.
To reiterate the paramount interest
of the Sumilao farmers over the 144 hectares of land, they are members of
Higaonon tribes, landless farmers, farm workers, and community residents
in San Vicente, Sumilao, Bukidnon. Being such, the Sumilao
Farmers undoubtedly have legal personality to file the petition for
cancellation/revocation of the conversion order as they are the immediate
community residents who are directly affected by the conversion of
the land.
Surigao City Police Officers,
not successful in stopping the marchers
Approaching the city proper of
Surigao City, around 10 unidentified police officers attempted to stop the
marchers to go on with their walk. The farmers learned that one of the
police officers was monitoring the movement of the marchers. They prepared
for the arrival of the marchers and welcomed them with an attempt to stop
them. But the determination of the marchers prevailed. The police officers
were left with no option but to let the marchers pass and continue their
walk.
The Fellowship Goes on
On the 14th day of the march, the
fellowship of the 144-hectare land is maintained. The counting still
continues. The marchers would like to thank the different groups who
welcomed, visited and joined them this day. Among others, they were:
Surigao del Norte Pastoral Center; Balay Dabaw Sur, Inc. (BDSI);
Chairperson and Members of Barangay Agrarian Reform Council of Brgy.
Quezon, Surigao City; St. Vincent Ferrer Parish Church ; Reach Foundation,
Inc. (RFI); and Social Action Center of Surigao and Butuan. Likewise, the
farmers received unwavering support (in cash and in kind) from the
following individuals: Bayang Barrios, Father Briggs Udtujan, Sister Bing
Aguilino, Father Joseph of Lipata Parish, Arcellin Napalan of RFI, and
Father Cornelio Turraja of Padada Davao del Sur.
It is but important to mention the
continued and touching gesture of the by-standers along the stretch of the
march. The local community people were shouting words of support to the
farmers. Some gave water, canned goods and others. And yet another tear
jerking moment during the walk was when an old lady handed one of the
marchers 1 kilo of rice (the miracle of 5 loaves and 2 fishes continues).
You may visit YouTube
to witness for yourself this gesture of the unidentified old lady.
The Sumilao farmers would like also
to extend their appreciation to the support groups in the Visayas in
groundworking and preparing for the route where the farmers will pass when
they reach the different municipalities and barangays in the said region.
These are KAISAHAN, Department of Agrarian Reform (Region 8) led by RD
Homer Tobias, Provincial Agrarian Reform Officers (PAROs), Municipal
Agrarian Reform Officers (MAROs), Parish Priests, Father Feme (SAC
Director in the Diocese of Maasin), Fr. Carlo Curacut (Silago), Fr. Croft
Climaco (Hinunangan), Fr. Boy Vega, Fr. Manuel Lagumbay (St. Bernard),
KAMAO and BRAMO (partners of KAISAHAN in its ASDP Project in Ormoc), and
other groups and individuals.
(We are calling all support groups
[individuals or organizations] to contribute to the everyday updates of
the Sumilao farmers. We might forget some significant events or we might
forget to acknowledge/include your organization in some articles, that's
why we would like to request, if you have comments or suggestions, please
feel free to send those to balaodmindanaw@gmail.com.
Thank you very much.)
|