Introduction
Balay
Mindanaw Foundation Inc. is Mindanao-based and Mindanao-focused NGO.
BMFI’s work and its people articulate a sense of fierce
pride for Mindanao and a passion for transforming this poorest and
most conflict-torn of the country’s regions into a “balay”, a
true home for its peoples – Christians, Muslims and Lumads, the
indigenous peoples of Mindanao.
BMFI has a
total of 22 staff and volunteers, but only a few of them can be
found at the office at any given time because most of the people are
spread out in the areas where BMFI does its work – in Claveria,
Lagonglong and Sugbongcogon and Gingoog City in Misamis Oriental,
and in Loreto, Dinagat Island in Surigao del Norte.
As
widespread as BMFI’s scope of operations, so are its activities
diverse. Pursuing a vision of equity, development and peace for
Mindanao through a sustainable integrated area development (SIAD)
approach by promoting democratic participation in local governance
and agrarian reform implementation obviously entails a lot of work
in community organizing, networking, partnership building, research,
publication and advocacy.
Its founders are a mix of individuals with a common concern
for the development of Mindanao through agrarian reform, sustainable
development and democratic participation in governance.
Local
Governance
Governance,
according to the dictionary, is “government.”
If you think of government as the act or process of
governing, that would be an accurate definition of governance.
But present usage understands governance to go beyond
government.
To
distinguish ‘governance’ from ‘government,’ it may encompass
the many ways that individuals and social institutions – families,
schools, religious organizations, the media, businesses, unions,
professional groups, voluntary associations, as well as units of
government – manage to accommodate and cooperate.”
One NGO
involved in governance work, defines it as the interaction of
government entities with civil society, corporate sector, and
political parties in order to craft state policy, implement
programs, projects, and activities, and monitor and evaluate these
so as to improve policy formulation or implementation.”
The common
elements are interaction, accommodation, and cooperation.
You cannot have governance without either a government or the
governed. In modern
societies governments rule with the consent and participation of the
governed. One key
concern of modern progressive politics is how to increase and
improve the quality of citizen or civic participation.
Context
of Local Governance Work:
The
lack of genuine empowerment of peoples and communities remains the
central political reality in the Philippines and in Mindanao today. The opportunities for more democratic participation in
governance offered by the Local Government Code have remained
largely unoptimized.
The 1991
Local Government Code provides for administrative, fiscal and
political decentralization. In administrative terms, powers of
taxation and responsibility for services are divided between four
main tiers of government: national, provincial, city/municipal and
barangay.
In fiscal
terms, the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA, government revenue from
direct and indirect taxes excluding customs and excise duties) is
split 60:40 between central government and local government units
(LGUs). The 40% allotted to LGUs is in turn split between provinces
(23%), cities (23%): towns/municipalities (34%) and barangays (20%).
Thus, barangays receive 20% of the IRA allocated to LGUs. Barangays
raise additional revenue from other sources, such as the hire of
facilities, and can apply for funding from provincial, city or
municipal development funds. In turn, the barangay must allocate its
IRA as mandated by law: honoraria for officials (55%); Barangay
Development Fund (20%); Sangguniang
Kabataan (Youth Council)
(10%); Calamity Fund (5%); Reserve Fund (5%) and Discretionary Fund
(5%). The Barangay Development Fund thus represents a major source
of investment in infrastructure and services, along with other
allocations that a barangay obtains.
In
political terms, the Code provides for directly-elected officials at
province, city, town/municipality and barangay level, including
Barangay Captains or Chairpersons
and Barangay Kagawad (Councillors), who constitute the Barangay Council. A Barangay Council consists of 9
members: 7 Kagawad, the
Barangay Captain, and the chair of the Sangguniang Kabataan.
The Barangay Development Council, responsible for the disbursement
of the Barangay Development Fund, is not directly elected and
consists of Barangay Kagawad, others nominated by the Barangay
Council, and the various sectors and tribes of the barangay.
However,
traditional patronage politics continue to dominate the Philippine
political landscape. The
efforts of some LGUs and NGOs to optimize the windows of
opportunities offered by the Code have managed to reach only a small
fraction of the country. Legitimate
POs and NGOs continue to struggle for the mandated participation in
the local special bodies. The
challenge remains of how to vigorously pursue organizing, education
and formation work to enable peoples and communities to participate
more meaningfully in governance.
There is
however a growing informal social movement centered on leading NGOs,
LGU executives and professional groups that believes in and works
towards empowerment and sustainable development of communities with
the Barangay as the locus and focus of their initiatives. Workable models for institutionalizing democratic
participation of peoples and communities in local development
planning, program implementation and participatory monitoring and
evaluation have been developed and are now in the process of being
replicated in more areas.
Some
LGUs – such as Claveria and Gingoog in Misamis Oriental and Loreto
in Surigao del Norte - have already reorganized and strengthened
their development councils; drawn up their community profiles using
Participatory Rural Appraisal – PRA; formulated their own
development plans; developed the relevant projects; mobilized
internal and external resources; and most are already implementing
some of the projects that they have developed.
In these LGUs, civil society participation is noticeably
strong and vibrant.
Local
Governance in the Context of Sustainable Integrated Area
Development:
BMFI’s
SIAD Work follows the COCO-BREAD Framework also being used by the
Philippine Community Organizers’ Society (PHILCOS).
|
C -
Collective, Critical Creative Consciousness-Raising (CCCR)
O -
Organization Development and Leadership Formation (ODLF)
C - Coalition
Efforts and Advocacy Work (CEAW)
O -
Overcoming Gender and other Biases (OGOB)
B
- Basic Services and Infrastructure (BSI)
R -
Resource Tenure Improvement (RTI)
E -
Economic Self-Reliance Strengthening (ESRS)
A -
Agricultural Development and Ecological Nurturance (ADEN)
D
– Democratic Participation in Governance (DPG)
|
|
The
overall objective of BMFI’s SIAD work is to help build empowered
sustainable and peaceful communities where a critical mass of
residents is able to analyze the situation, formulate plans, develop
projects and generate internal and external resources to meet
priority needs, and participate meaningfully in local governance.
Specifically,
it aims to:
1.
organize and strengthen local sectoral organizations and
cooperatives capable of formulating and implementing their own plans
and projects, and actively participating in local mandated
structures like the Barangay Development Council (BDC);
2.
increase the management capacity of target barangay communities and
local government units in order to equip the population with the
planning, negotiating and organizational skills to influence their
own development;
3.
encourage and stimulate economic and agricultural initiatives in
rural areas in order to improve household food security and raise
incomes;
4.
establish/strengthen venues for people’s participation in barangay
governance;
5.
promote and improve the representation of the poor and their
interests in existing institutions.
The
outputs include:
-
community
participation in the formulation and identification of the
Barangay development agenda which uplifts the entire barangay
rather than individuals;
-
Barangay
development plans with annual operational plans, annual
investment plans and barangay annual budget formulated with the
participation of the Barangay residents, the LGUs and the POs;
-
functioning
and organised Barangay Development Councils;
-
established/strengthened
venues for peoples participation in barangay governance;
-
livelihood
projects and appropriate enterprises implemented;
-
priority
projects like small infrastructures and basic services funded
and implemented
BMFI’s
Area-Based Community Development (ABCD) Work in the Barangays
The
Area-Based Operations Team (ABOT) continues to live and work
fulltime in 50 upland and/or indigenous communities that have been
identified as BMFI focus-barangays.
In these barangays, BMFI’s intervention is at its fullest.
This is seen as the important anchor to keep BMFI
“grounded” and rooted as it pursues its other multi-level
involvement in development work.
BMFI’s
barangay-based and barangay-level work focuses on the following:
-
Local
governance work especially through facilitating the
strengthening of local people’s organizations and
cooperatives, the barangay development councils (BDCs), the
conduct of PRAs, the formulation of barangay development plans
(BDPs), enterprise development, internal and external resource
mobilization and indigenous technology development.
-
Helping
improve people’s access to justice through
institution-building and capability-building interventions
-
Agrarian
reform particularly land tenure and productivity improvement
towards food security
The
following are expected to be achieved:
-
barangay
project committees formed and functional
-
community-based
M&E system installed in each barangay
-
barangay-based
para-legal teams formed and functional
-
at
least one para-agriculturist and local organizer trained and
functional per barangay
-
projects
prioritized and developed already being implemented
-
barangay
development centers established and functional
-
tribal
centers established and functional
Projected impact on the communities:
-
Increase
in household income
-
Greater
and more institutionalized participation in local governance,
and greater access to justice
-
Improved
land tenure security
Description:
BMFI
implements its program entitled Helping Build Empowered Sustainable and Peaceful Communities in Mindanao
through its Area-Based Community Development (ABCD) or SIAD Work.
The
barangay is the clear locus and focus of BMFI’s area-based work in
agrarian reform and local governance leading to sustainable
integrated area development (SIAD).
After six years of barangay-based work, BMFI has seen the
evolution of a set of strategies and technologies:
1.
Continuing Community
Organizing and Mobilization
The
work involves
facilitating the establishment of the appropriate
community/interest/peoples organizations - peasant/farmers, fisher
folk, tribal, youth, vendors, women, cooperative - in areas where
there are none, and the strengthening of those already in existence.
The BMFI Area-Based Operating Team continues to pursue more
intensively its work of organizing and strengthening local sectoral
organizations and cooperatives capable of formulating and
implementing their own plans and projects, and actively
participating in local mandated structures like the Barangay
Development Council (BDC). At
least one peoples’ organization and/or cooperative in each of the
barangays is assisted as it actively engages in partnership work and
mobilization towards good local governance.
To achieve this, community meetings and conferences are held
regularly. Initially, there is a need to cover subsidy for food,
meeting materials and transportation support for participants who
would come from the farthest puroks.
The Team Leaders and the fulltime community organizers
(called Sustainable Integrated Area Organizers or
SIADOs) that comprise the BMFI ABOT live and work fulltime in
these communities. To
effectively and efficiently do their jobs in these far-flung upland
communities, the SIADOs are provided with motorbikes and the
appropriate communication facilities.
They are also provided the necessary operating funds for
their food and other basic necessities or a monthly CO allowance.
2.
Local Development
Planning Processes
Once
the mechanisms for broad and genuine participation are set up, it
would be the BMFI ABOT’s function to help facilitate a
participatory local development planning process leading all the way
to project implementation. The
Local Government Code in Section 109 mandates the BDCs to mobilize
people’s participation in local development efforts; prepare
barangay development plans (BDPs) based on local requirements; and
monitor and evaluate the implementation of national or local
programs and projects. Thus,
particular attention is given to the establishment and capability
building of the BDCs. The
salient stages/components of participatory local development
planning are: Barangay Profiling and Assessment,
Barangay Development Planning, Sub-Project
Development, Resource Mobilization
and Plan Implementation. Workshops
will have to be conducted to ensure that the priority projects
identified though the participatory planning processes are indeed
truly responsive to the most pressing needs of the residents.
Project development workshops will also have to be conducted
to ensure that the people themselves are truly the primary
stakeholders even during the earliest stage of the project cycle.
3.
Barangay LGU Capability
Building and Organizational Development
The
aim is to develop the capability of the barangays for effective and
efficient local governance, and in setting up and strengthening the
mechanisms for genuine participation by people in governance.
The work entails networking with the local officials - both
elected and appointed; conduct of local governance seminars for
officials and staff; assessing the status of the BDCs; facilitating
the (re)organization of the BDCs; and other interventions in LGU
capability building especially local development planning; revenue
optimisation; budgeting; external
resource mobilisation; and project planning, implementation and
monitoring. BMFI helps
to ensure that communities, peoples’ organizations and
cooperatives are sufficiently equipped with the capacities to
implement the projects that they have identified and developed
through participatory local development planning.
Special attention is also given to the enhancement of
project-specific capabilities that would correspond to the
livelihood projects prioritized.
4.
Resource Mobilization
and Setting Up of Barangay/ Community Development Support Block Fund
Once formulated, the BDP becomes the
basis for project prioritization and development.
In most cases, the internal resources from the barangay and
the households are not enough to implement the priority projects.
BMFI then assists the barangays to mobilize external
resources. The
Stakeholders’ Forum has proven to be an effective mechanism to do
this. Once external
resources are mobilized, a block fund will be set up to ensure that
these resources for the implementation of priority projects are
properly managed. Local
decision-making, planning, implementing, coordinating and monitoring
mechanisms will be established.
Emphasis is given on the generation of internal resources as
counterpart funds before money from the Support Block Fund may be
released. This fund may
also be tapped by the communities as a source of their local
counterpart for small infrastructure projects such as water system
installation, health center repair and construction, farm-to-market
road construction, and other projects funded by government but
requires local counterpart. The Project Implementation and
Monitoring Committee (PIMC) draws up the appropriate policies and
mechanisms to guide the utilization of the fund.
Project
Implementation and Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation
Peoples and
communities have to experience their own “small victories” to
inspire them to work harder and continue having faith in coming
together. Thus, the
projects have to be implemented after ensuring that sufficient
internal and external resources have been mobilized.
And it is not enough that projects are implemented, their
implementation have to be appropriately monitored and evaluated. The
Project Implementing and Monitoring Committee (PIMC) is also
expected to regularly and systematically coordinate and monitor the
projects. Since the project is anchored on the SIAD framework,
participatoriness, democratization and partnership are considered as
fundamental elements. Thus, the system designed is also premised on
these key elements. This is known as Participatory Monitoring and
Evaluation.
Some of the principles used as guides are:
-
Building
on what people already know
-
Using
and developing people's abilities and skills to monitor and
evaluate their own progress
-
Helping
people to see whether their activities are having an impact on
project objectives
-
Revealing
whether human and material resources are being used efficiently,
effectively and at a cost that the project can afford
-
Enabling
people to study their own methods of organization and management
-
Providing
good information for making decisions about planning and project
direction
-
Enabling
people to see their own project in a wider context such as how
it relates to other development initiatives
-
Increasing
the sense of collective responsibility for project activities.
More
Explanations About the Support Fund:
This
Fund is a key factor in ensuring that the barangays and/or the
peoples’ organizations (POs) and cooperatives actually implement
the projects that they themselves have identified and developed
through participatory and democratic planning processes.
This will allow them to experience “small victories”
which would in turn inspire them to continue having faith in coming
and working together.
The
Fund is also seen as a supplementary and complementary resource
intended to encourage the communities to appreciate and mobilize
their own internal resources. Thus,
it can only be tapped by the barangays, POs and cooperatives if they
show the willingness and ability to invest and generate capital and
resources from the households and even the LGU through its IRA.
The
gaps or the requirements for external resources to implement
priority projects are usually high.
The Fund is definitely not enough to cover all the costs for
all the projects. The list of priority projects is just a shortlist
from where the barangays/POs/cooperatives may choose from.
It is therefore necessary that the communities are provided
the guidance and the skills to prioritize projects according to
appropriate standards or criteria like degree of necessity,
affordability, viability, sustainability, degree or numbers of those
who would benefit from impact, and other factors which the
communities would consider a appropriate.
The necessary mechanisms and structures for democratic
decision-making, project implementation and monitoring and
evaluation will be established.
Local project management committees (PMCs) will be formed.
There
are two “windows” under this Fund:
a) Livelihood Revolving Support Fund and b) Small
Infrastruture Support Fund.
The
Livelihood Revolving Support Fund is intended to provide
enough money to serve as “trigger mechanism” for the barangay
residents to put in their own counterpart (money and/or materials)
and the barangay’s money through their
IRA to develop and implement livelihood projects. This fund
is aimed to promote local livelihood activities, which will be
accessed by residents. A Project Management Committee manages the
fund and monitors and evaluates the projects.
Livelihood projects may be an expansion of their current
livelihood or can be a supplementary activity to augment the family
income. For agricultural projects, crops may be insured to protect
the farmers from major natural calamities. The avail of this window, the communities have to first
generate or raise their own internal resources.
The Livelihood Revolving Support Fund is managed by the
barangays through their respective Project Implementation and
Monitoring Committees (PIMCs).
The Small
Infrastructure Support Fund is intended to respond to need of the
barangays to raise “local counterparts” required by government
before infrastructure projects are implemented. This window will help the communities develop and implement
socially-responsive infrastructure projects
like farm to market roads, potable water systems, and the
construction of health and daycare centers.
To avail of this window, the communities will have to show
approved programs of works and proof of firm funding commitment from
the concerned government agency.
What do we seek to do then?
We only seek to realize what is already mandated by the law,
that any form of development planning and intervention
must begin at the community level.
Only, this is not what happens.
The national government forms its plans on its own,
and the province, the city or the municipality does the same;
hence a top-down approach.
What we seek to do is to overturn the
process and locate development firmly at the barangay or cluster of
barangays.
This approach entails that the
community - men, women, youth, farmers, fishers and lumads –
identify their own resources, identify their community boundaries,
interests and needs and develop plans of action in which to utilize
and manage their resources to serve the community’s needs and
interests.
This approach will help ensure that
any intervention, any action will be based on the community’s
situation,
get the community’s participation
and ensure sustainability of any such action.